|
|
 |
edusearch articles |
|
|
|
|
| Examining the case for immunisation |
Article images
- click to enlarge - |
| Author : Dianne Panel
|
|
| Created : 06 Dec 2001
|
| Last Revision : 07 Dec 2001
|
We need to take a fresh look at the actual content of vaccines, and discover the truth about the alleged toxic or cumulative contents. Are they present in higher concentrations than those used in other medications, which are widely accepted and used frequently? What base materials are used in the production of vaccines?
When I began my research it was relatively easy to unveil the vaccine contents, but when I attempted to uncover the base products I hit a brick wall. I was curious to know why the companies seemed evasive in this regard and discovered they were reluctant to divulge trade secrets to competitors. I was unconvinced.
These companies are faced with escalating consumer resistance to their products. They must realise that the most effective 'yeast' in the development of such opposition is the cloak of mystery they are wrapping around their product.
It is human nature to fear the unknown. Who would be willing to inject their children with something secretive, and now under scrutiny?
If a child suffers ill effects following vaccination, the parent feels to blame for having the child vaccinated. If, on the other hand, a child contracts a disease, the parent can offload the blame onto the disease itself, nature, time and circumstance � call it what you will. Food manufacturers are required by law to list the product ingredients on the label. I fail to understand why vaccine manufacturers are able to side-step this law. If we have the right to know exactly what we are consuming, it is surely even more important that we know exactly what we are injecting into our children's bloodstreams.
|
< < 1 2 3 4 > >
|
|
